James Gammon

James Gammon, a rangy, gruff character actor who found his natural mileau in a slew of plays by Sam Shepard, died in Costa Mesa on July 16. He was 70 years old.

With his grizzled, weather-beaten face and hoarse voice, Mr. Gammon was a natural resident of the mythical and mourned American West Shepard used as the backdrop of many of his plays. Squinting under what seemed to be a never-setting Oklahoma sun, Mr. Gammon would alternately growl, mutter and bark his lines in such plays as Curse of the Starving Class, The Late Henry Moss, and the New York premieres of A Lie of the Mind and Simpatico.

“Shut Up, Dorn”
Probably one of my favorite movie lines ever, and one I consistently mimic.
This actor was simply one of my favorites. He always gave me good vibes and great hope as a character actor myself.
I saw him a few times on stage, most notably in Simpactico at the Public Theatre and Buried Child on Broadway, where his Dodge was just brilliant.
Also, saw him at a SAG Conversation a couple years ago. Awesome fellow. Out here in LA he was an early pioneer of making good quality contemporary theatre.

This news make me really sad…

R.I.P. James Gammon

But after some diligent research and a whole lotta’ back & forth on the merits and demerits, we’ve decided to start pulling all of our photos from Facebook.

Everyone has heard by this point all the hullaballoo about Facebook’s privacy issues. What you may have missed is the issue of ownership. We’ve discovered bits of language in the Facebook Terms of Service that, frankly, disturb us.

When you post User Content to the Site, you authorize and direct us to make such copies thereof as we deem necessary in order to facilitate the posting and storage of the User Content of the Site. By posting User Content to any part of the Site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to the Company an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part) and distribute such User Content for any purpose on or in connection with the Site or the promotion thereof, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such User Content, and to grant and authorize sublicense of the foregoing.

What this basically means is that although Facebook allows us to retain ownership over our uploaded work, we also understand that Facebook declares it has the right to do whatever, whenever with our photographs. If Facebook wanted to sell our images, of our clients, to someone else, they absolutely can and we’ll never know. But this isn’t an issue of money or recompense; ownership over our work is something we take very seriously here at Little Acorn Photography, in both personal and professional stances. And its also an issue of protecting you, the client.

We can’t, in good conscience, allow for a third-party entity to stake a claim to our work and potentially use images of our clients without our or their knowledge, so at this point, the best we can do to rectify this is by removing our photos from the L.A.P. page. This is a small part of why we started this blog, so we would have a different, and easy, way to share the latest images with everyone in one convenient area.

I ran across this at the Little Acorn Photography website while doing some research on Posterous (slowly becoming my new interweb home).

Wow! is call that comes to mind. You still own your photos and other content, but if you read that inner blockquote carefully, you are authorizing the sublicense of ALL your user content to used to promote or make derivative works from or incorporate into other work.

So, basically, if I’m interpreting this correctly, thefacebook could publish a book called “People of Facebook” and post any photos that have been uploaded. Or “Babies of Facebook 2010″ and all the folks posting photos of there kidz would be granting a license to use those photos in a book, movie, video, what-have-you.

Now, would thefacebook actually DO that, in light of all the recent flack over privacy? I don’t [italics]think[italics] they would, but they have the [italics]right[italics] to.

With the age of digital/mobile photos and insta-posting, who knows what the true ownership is anymore.

SNEAK PEAK of Kevin’s Stand-up Special which begins airing on Showtime (July 29th, 2010).

About a year ago, I published a question in a Blackberry forum asking how the devices had helped to make professionals more productive.

The responses I received were typified by the one that I remember the most: “I am more productive because I can check my email on  the train to and from work.”

This seemed like a reasonable response at the time. As a person who gets a bit nervous when I have nothing productive to do, I could relate.  While I don’t take the train, the value of converting “down time” to productive time is a pretty attractive one.

And apparently, I’m not alone.

A recent  survey of 1 million users in 34 countries showed that 62% believed that their work productivity was “much better” due to new technology.  75%  consider the opportunity provided by devices such as smartphones and laptops to remain in constant contact with work as a positive development.

Apparently, “productivity” has been redefined.

According to our new definition, productivity has something to do with two things: converting “down time” to work time, and  being able to  “stay in touch” with what’s happening at work at all times.  This  kind of commitment used to be associated with  “Type A” executives, but nowadays anyone with the right tools can join in the fun.

“Fun” might be a strong word, but many of us like to find new ways  to be effective, and like to feel as if we’re getting better at  managing our time.

However, what’s actually happening in the life of many  professionals is not amusing at all.  Their companies  have taken the opportunity given them by technology and the recession to convince employees to spend more  “down time” doing work.  At the same time, they send a subtle message that  “staying in touch” with work also means being available 24 hours  a day for 52 weeks of the year.

Converting “Down Time” Nowadays, it seems, everyone with a smartphone has gotten into the habit of continuously trying to convert “down time” into useful, work time.  Here are some everyday examples of ways in which many professionals are converting their “down time.”

• - a manager driving on the highway at 70 m.p.h. sends a text to his team  (while spilling hot coffee into his lap)
• - an engineer in a meeting that’s going slowly, checks her email and replies (missing two action items assigned to her)
• - an accountant watching his child play baseball on Saturday morning closes a deal in the fourth inning via cellphone (and lies to his  son about seeing him make his first catch ever)
• - a supervisor attending 3 days of personal productivity training is unable to leave her smartphone untouched for more than 15 minutes (and later complains that  the trainer was ineffective)
• - a consultant speaking to a client on the phone remembers that  he should have sent an urgent message to a colleague, and quietly does so (even as the client notes the sudden lapse in attention and interprets it as a lack of interest in continuing the relationship)
• - a hard driving attorney once again takes his smartphone to the  urinal where he can multi-task (… and is noticed by his boss’ husband who happened to borrow his smartphone just five minutes earlier)
• - a family cheers in unison when executive-Mom forgets her  smartphone at home 5 hours into the annual vacation (and falls into  despair when FedEx delivers it the next day)

I recently asked a client: “How did your big presentation to the executive team go?”  She responded: “OK… but the CEO spent the entire hour on his (expletive)  Blackberry.”

This was bad news for my client, whose project was now being viewed by the CEO as another chunk of his “down time.”

If these are all examples of attempts to convert “down time” into useful time, take note of the way in which “down time” has been expanded.  This  is more than filling in the time that would be spent sitting on a train.  The habit has invaded every nook and cranny of our lives, sparing no-one, and costing us dearly.

At this point, many of you reading are probably shaking your heads at  some of the poor etiquette on display.  I did the same, until I began to think of the mindset of the employees involved.

All the habits listed above were developed by professionals who  were well intended — they were trying to boost their productivity by converting “down time” into something of value. Unfortunately,  once we humans are hooked on a habit, it’s hard to stop, and  we end up employing it inappropriately, much to the annoyance of others in our lives.  In that moment, the fun has disappeared and the habit has become an empty, automatic practice that does more harm than good.

The worse part is that in many companies, executives are leading  the way by example, as they are often the first users of these devices and the employees most likely to squeeze work into every available minute of their lives.

They are also the ones who are unwilling to sever the connection between themselves and their colleagues, even for a few hours  each day.

Staying in Touch With Work A friend of mine once told me the story of a manager of  rambunctious employee who was essential to the organization, but  frequently complained and threatened to leave.  In the space of a few months, he got married, bought a house and had a baby.

After these happy events, his manager passed my friend in the hall on hearing the latest it of happy news and whispered conspiratorially: “I have him  now!”  In other words, with his new family and financial obligations,  the rambunctious employee was unlikely to raise more trouble, and  would probably settle into a comfortable routine of corporate  service with a steady eye on his pension, benefits and 401(k).

The point of the story?  There are executives and managers who are blithely offering the gift of smartphones to their employees, and  in some companies it’s seen as a reward, and a status symbol.

What many of them know, however, is that when an employee accepts the device, they are likely to join the group of the always-reachable, and engage in many of the behaviors that their higher-ups are practicing,  such as: – sending and receiving messages at 2:30 am – using weekends, vacations and holidays to conduct company business – implicitly agreeing to respond to all messages within a short time-frame – interrupting ANY activity to “find out what my boss wants”

(If the stories told on YouTube and on blogs are true, then  _anything_ can be interrupted nowadays by smartphone use!)

To put it in more Machiavellian terms, companies have found a way to take time and attention that employees used  to spend on their own, with their families and with their friends, and convert it to company time.  It starts with the gift of a  smartphone.

While I truly doubt that there is some master plan, don’t doubt for a minute that a manager doesn’t know the difference between her employees who are always-reachable from those who aren’t. Companies can make big gains in productivity by simply giving away smartphones to their employees, while ignoring the added stress that gets created.

There are some companies that are noticing what is happening, however.

Enlightened companies take a page out of the medical profession, which has long realized that it’s important to maintain  some kind of boundaries in their professionals’ lives.  Companies can put in place policies that clearly delineate  time spent “at work,” “on call” and “away from work.”   They recognize that these are three distinct modes that must be  enforced if employees are expected to function at their best.

Most employees, however, find themselves in un-enlightened companies and  must make their own way, starting with 3 steps they must take.

Their first step is to identify the unproductive habits in their time management system.  They can do the kind of analysis I describe on my website (www.2time-sys.com) to find the strong and weak spots.

The second step is to create an improvement plan that outlines the habits to be changed, along with some target dates. This gives  them some realistic goals to heard towards.

The third step requires them to create an environment to make the habit changes easier to effect.  Unfortunately, most  habits do not change easily or quickly, and the right blend of supports can make all the difference.

Employees who have begun this personal journey need to make  a plan to enlighten the executive team.  Most smartphone use started with the CEO and her direct reports, and they are the ones who, in  all likelihood, introduced, for example, a culture of 24 hour  availability to the organization.

In an effort like this, employees need allies at all levels to  help demonstrate that bad habits  developed in the executive suite can wreak havoc when rolled out to an entire company.  (There  is a growing body of data available that can be used in this effort.)  In an intervention, executives can be asked to imagine an  all-company meeting in which half the attendees spend most of the  meeting on their smartphones, lost in cyber-space.  (Some would  simply argue that they are following the fine example of their CEO!)

If the executive team can be convinced that these behaviors  are destructive, then the company can move to specify some  specific changes.

For example, the US Federal Government has banned the use of  cell-phones by its employees while they are driving and conducting government business.  In part, that’s because of obvious safety reasons.

From a productivity stand-point, however, it makes perfect sense. Other policies can be introduced to limit the use of smartphones and laptops during off hours, for starters.  (In some companies, turning off all messaging devices between 12:00 am and 6:00 am would be a major step.)

Each company needs to look at its culture, as well as its  strategy, and phase in these changes in a way that makes sense. They need to allow for the fact that habit change takes time, and  that a new culture could not be born in an instant.

The single employee who decides to change their company has a very difficult task on her hands, however, as she realizes that smartphones have done more to change company culture in the past few years than any vision statement or 2 day retreat.  She needs to appreciate that  some executives may decide that they like the way things are going, and don’t want to change a thing.   Those companies who take this route probably won’t see any  immediate fallout as employees cling to their jobs for fear of losing them, but they’ll  pay later.  At some point in the future, productivity will be impacted on a large scale, as employees burn themselves out and the bottom  line suffers.

It’s much better to make the small, enlightened changes now, than  to wait until the cost is higher and the effort required seems to  be impossible to garner.

All it takes to get started is one or two employees who are willing  to redefine what productivity means for themselves and their  companies, in favour of long-term results that are sustainable.

This kind of thinking has become prevalent in the show biz world as well. Actors are being told that there is no excuse for not “being available”, that they “should” have a smartphone so they can get emails at all hours, because “you don’t know when something might come in”. This is kind of sickening.

Seriously, everyone, slow down!

Yes, smartphones give you easier access when out and about and they do come in handy, but seriously, to be making it a “requirement” – Come on! Personally, I do have a iPhone, but the email feature is set to NOT alert me. I check the email on my schedule (usually every couple hours, but sometimes less). If it’s important, they’ll call. And that’s a thought for another time (”you don’t HAVE to answer the phone”), so for now, take it easy, slow down. I’m not saying disappear for days at a time, but don’t be a slave to the technology.

###

We congratulate the films screened at FirstGlance Hollywood.
The awards were determined by the screening committee and presented to the filmmakers over the festival weekend.

Check back soon for the announcement of the BEST of the FEST and the highest rated films in each category!

We thank you for our best Hollywood event in our history!!

Features

In My Pocket – David Lisle Johnson
Best Ensemble Cast

Western

The Western Regional Membership Meeting will be on
Monday, January 11, 2010
at 11 a.m. in the Bellamy Boardroom (5th Floor)
of the Equity Building
6755 Hollywood Boulevard, Hollywood, CA

The agenda includes:

• Presentation of the Lucy Jordan Award.

• SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS TO NOMINATE AND SELECT THE MEMBERSHIP PORTION OF THE 2010 WESTERN REGIONAL NOMINATING COMMITTEE.

• Membership Discussion Period in accordance with the By-Laws.

Would like to see a better turnout then last fall!